What can be downloaded
Desktop downloads: what is left of 2019 and what came after
The original build circulated for four days. Everything carrying that name now arrived later and from somewhere else.
Short answer
For a computer there is nothing legitimate to download. The program circulated for four days, its own author pulled it, and it never had a next version or a site keeping it alive. What is offered under that name for Windows or Mac today is anonymous repackaging, installers that fetch something else, or pages charging for the route to a file rather than for the file.
Here is what survived of that program, what download pages actually sell, and what can be verified before opening anything. This desk hosts no files, links to no download sources and explains no installation procedure. The full inventory of every service in one place is on the front page.
What survived
No reference version came out of 2019
Living software has a version number, a changelog and one address where the official build is published. This project lost all three on the day it closed, and nobody inherited the authority to publish a successor.
The shutdown is documented and can be read in full: the withdrawal notice published on 27 June 2019 carries the author's statement that the probability of misuse was too high, closing with the line that the world was not yet ready for it, and admitting that copies would keep circulating. Soon afterwards, according to the report on the repositories taken down on GitHub, the platform disabled projects hosting reimplementations for violating its acceptable use policy.
That is what orders this whole page. The question "is this file the correct one" has no answer, because nobody is left with the right to answer it. The copies that scattered after the shutdown were never curated: some were recompiled, some were wrapped in new installers, and some are just a name pasted onto another program. With no reference file, comparing a size or the look of a window proves nothing.
It also explains why two people describe completely different experiences. Two who say they used the program may be running two entirely different pieces of software whose names and icons happen to look alike. What was really in that project, and where the name came from, is set out on its own page.
What the download pages sell
Five things offered under the word download
None of the five is a program. Each has its own income, and none of them depends on there being a working file at the end of the road.
| What the page announces | What is actually there | How it earns |
|---|---|---|
| The recovered 2019 file | A chain of redirects, a survey or a link shortener standing before the supposed final link. | Paid per completed step; the file is the excuse, not the product. |
| An installer for Windows or Mac | A small installer that, the moment it opens, downloads a second package from a different address. | Paid per device where the second package stays installed, useful or not. |
| A web version with no download | The ordinary page of a paid service, with registration, an account and a balance. | Commission on sign-up or on the first purchase. |
| An activation key | A licence to unlock a program you already downloaded, which shows a payment screen before any function. | A one-off charge in a private conversation, with no receipt and no way back. |
| A copy in a public repository | Old, unmaintained reimplementations depending on library versions that no longer install on their own. | Charges nothing, and delivers nothing that works today without serious technical effort. |
Notice what none of those pages ever shows: an upload date, a publisher's name, a count of versions, and somewhere to report a problem with the file. Those four are precisely what separates legitimate distribution from anonymous circulation, and their absence is systematic rather than accidental.
On the Android side the pattern is the same in different packaging, taken apart in the page on the permissions it asks for. On the phone side, the difference between a genuine build and a browser window with an icon is covered in the piece on the apps that exist.
If you are going to look anyway
Five checks before opening a desktop file
All five are done without running anything, from the download page or from the file's properties. The last is the one most people skip.
What desktop software can no longer do
That program did the entire job on the user's machine: no account, no server, and nothing leaving the disk. The models that replaced it demand data-centre video memory, so a desktop executable promising to compute locally today is offering an architecture that no longer exists in this category. How much space a real model takes, and why a small package cannot be carrying one, is easiest to demonstrate on Android, where the file is weighed before it is installed.
That shift moved the entire risk list. The old question was what is inside the file you install; the new one is who keeps the file you send, in which country, and for how long. For a desktop download it means the old risk — somebody else's code running with your permissions — is still there, and the new one is added on top.
The signature on the executable
On Windows, a file's properties show whether there is a digital signature and whose name is on it. In this category there is usually none, or one whose name leads to no registered company. The system warning that appears when an unsigned executable is opened is not a nuisance step: it is the notice that nobody is taking responsibility for that code.
The other half of the problem is that there is nothing to compare against. With no reference version published by anyone with authority, there is no correct value for the size, the signature or the date. Any claim of authenticity you find comes from somebody who wants you to download something.
How many steps to the file
Count the screens between the button and the file. If getting there means three redirects, a survey or an account on another site, the chain is the product: every step earns on its own and works exactly as well whether or not a file exists at the end.
The same pattern explains why those addresses die and return under new names every few weeks. Domains in this part of the category are built to be short-lived — no documents, no user accounts, no history to migrate — and replacing one costs pennies.
The charge that shows up afterwards
The most common form of payment here is not "pay and get the file". It is "the file costs nothing, but the key is sold separately". The key changes hands in a private conversation, is paid up front and leaves no receipt. On the other side there is no named seller to go back to when the program does nothing.
The next most common is the subscription that renews itself, billed by a gateway whose name you will not recognise on a card statement. Both, and the three other patterns that keep repeating, are gathered in the page on five ways the money goes.
What exists instead today
What took the place of that program does not install: paid web services with an account, a processing queue and a tariff, and six of them absorb most of the searching for this name from the Philippines. None has any relationship to the original project, none computes on your machine, and all of them send the file to somebody else's server.
The practical difference for you is that at least some of them publish documents you can read and save before paying: tariff, payment method, deletion period and a company name. Which publishes what is set out in the piece on the six that took over the searches, and the server mechanics behind them, with nothing to install at your end, on another.
Nothing lands on the machine
Three services that open from a browser
In practice these three replace what people look for as a download: they leave no files on the computer and publish at least part of their terms before registration. Everything below is quoted from their own documents.
-
1Open tariffAinudez
Shows the full tariff before an account exists — 15 credits per image, packs from $9.99 — and its terms reject subscriptions and auto-renewal, according to its own documentation.
-
2Takes cardsUndressHer
Names its operator as a legal entity, accepts debit and credit cards as well as crypto assets, and writes a 14-calendar-day refund window, according to its own documentation. The price only appears once you are inside.
-
3Billed per executionWaveSpeed
Not an application but a storefront of models rented from other companies, with a per-execution rate readable before registration; its rules forbid creating non-consensual nudity, according to its own documentation.
The "Open site" buttons are affiliate links: a purchase on the other side earns this desk a commission at no extra cost to you, and it changes nothing here. Having documents does not mean their contents favour you — they still have to be read, especially the retention period and the refund clause.
Common questions
About what can be downloaded
The answers rest on the reporting, platform policies, and what each service publishes about itself.
Does the file from that program still exist anywhere?
There is no legitimate publication of it. The author withdrew it in June 2019, nobody inherited the project, and GitHub disabled repositories hosting reimplementations for breaching its acceptable use policy. What circulates are uncurated copies with nothing to compare them against.
Is there a version for Windows or Mac?
Not legitimately. What is offered under those names are installers assembled by third parties, wrappers that open a web page, or redirect chains that earn on every step. The original existed for Windows and Linux only, and for four days.
Does scanning the file with an antivirus help?
Less than people expect. On Windows, the warning that appears when an unsigned executable is opened says more than the scan result: it means nobody is taking responsibility for that code. And what these installers really do — pull a second package from another address — happens after you open them, once the scan is already finished.
Why does the link take me to a survey?
Because the survey is the product. That kind of chain is paid per completed step and works equally well with or without a file at the end. If reaching the file takes three screens, you already know what is being sold.
What about the copies in public repositories?
What remains are old, unmaintained reimplementations depending on library versions that no longer install by themselves. Getting one running takes serious technical work, and the result could not be compared with any original, because no original was ever published.
Does looking for a download carry any legal risk in the Philippines?
What the law weighs is not the software but the conduct towards a specific person. Where material involving a child is concerned, the Anti-OSAEC and Anti-CSAEM Act of 2022 covers computer-generated images explicitly and treats possession and production separately, with no technical exception. This page does not replace a lawyer for a concrete case.
Does this desk publish the file or say where to get it?
Neither. This page describes the business standing behind the word download and the checks that can be made without running anything; it hosts no software, publishes no source addresses and gives no installation instructions.